Paris, France vs. Paris, TX, by Matt Bracken:
Another video of the Paris attack. Imagine if the videographer had a deer rifle instead of a camera.
Nick Leghorn of thetruthaboutguns.com arranged a simulation of the Paris massacre, but with one victim armed. Of a dozen runs, only one armed victim “survived” (by running away) and none got both shooters. Two got one shooter. This apparently indicates that you need more than one armed defender. But it’s my understanding that the simulated attackers were trained to a level similar to the real attackers, while the victims not so much. That’s pretty accurate. But if the armed victim(s) were fairly well trained, the outcome may have been different yet.
We’ve heard of no new calls from France for more gun laws to further disarm the already disarmed there since the massacre. But we have already heard those calls from the UK and the US.
And regarding all those brain-dead liberal “journalists” who don’t want you to have guns, I wonder if they even noticed the massacre. They can go right on and put up their “no guns” signs and suffer the consequences. Me, I’ll take my own precautions.
Je Ne Suis Pas Charlie
Je Suis Arme
(No, I’m not Charlie. I AM armed.)